Sunday, April 22, 2012

On 'Thinking Fast and Slow' by Daniel Kahneman

March was a month I spent writing, and while I pushed myself to the limits of my writing potential and enjoyed the fruits of my labours, I missed reading as one would miss an old friend.

This month, amongst other reads, I picked up where I’d left off a few months ago with Thinking Fast and Slow by Daniel Kahneman. Kahneman is on all accounts bringing me back to my undergraduate days: days filled with reading on psychological theory and research (my first degree is in psych) and taking extensive notes as I read. Moreover, I am returned to that state of wonder that I so enjoyed as an undergraduate learner, as I read about the research, the experiments, as I learn about the complex ways in which we think, make decisions, use memory, and on and on.

Thinking Fast and Slow is a book that I know will take me a while to finish. I want to enjoy the stories that Kahneman tells, so eloquently, in order to illuminate the concepts for the reader. I want to ponder the concepts themselves and the implications of the research findings for my own personal life and, as always, as a teacher. Thus, while I’m not even close to finishing this book, I wanted to share some of the reading and thinking I’ve done so far.

The foundational idea of this book is that there are “two modes of thinking” (p. 20) - fast and slow.

The fast mode is described by Kahneman as:

“System 1 operates automatically and quickly, with little or no effort and no sense of voluntary control.” (Thinking Fast and Slow; Kahneman, D.; Doubleday Canada; 2011; p. 20) 

The slow mode:

“System 2 allocates attention to the effortful mental activities that demand it, including complex computations. The operations of System 2 are often associated with the subjective experience of agency, choice, and concentration.” (Thinking Fast and Slow; Kahneman, D.; Doubleday Canada; 2011; p. 21) 

Kahneman affirms that both systems are necessary modes of thinking, the fast for tasks like driving on a secluded roadway, and the slow for tasks like solving complex problems, or for driving while in the thick of traffic during a snowstorm. The book describes many instances, however where system 1 thinking kicks in where system 2 thinking would be preferable.

There are many caveats, information pertinent to our work as teachers and to our lives in general, even in the almost 200 pages that I’ve read so far. Here, I will try to share but a few of the ideas that I found most intriguing.


FLOW

photo credit: Kai Schreiber
Nancie Atwell calls it the ‘zone.’ One concept that Kahneman introduces early in the book is the notion of ‘flow,’ a concept with which I’m sure we’re all familiar. Flow is that ‘state of effortless concentration, so deep that people lose their sense of time, of themselves.’ (p.40) The wonderful thing about ‘flow’ is that even though people are apt to avoid the effort required by system 2 thinking most of the time (something Kahneman refers to as the ‘law of least effort’), people who experience ‘flow’ are in the thick of system 2 thinking and, contrary to the ‘law,’ are oblivious to the effort they are putting forth. What could be better? Full throttle effort without the strain of knowing you’re working hard!



EFFECTS OF COGNITIVE LOAD

photo credit: Jose Kevo
The classroom is quiet. Everyone is busy - maybe in a state of ‘flow’ or in the ‘zone’ - completing a tough assignment, one that requires complete system 2 concentration. And then, it happens! Someone makes a dubious noise. You sit at your desk, eyes turned upward to look at your hard-working students, hoping against all odds that they will ignore this sudden - uh, interruption. But unfortunately, that’s it; the tension has been broken and everyone is in full laugh out loud mode now. Kids are belly-laughing and rolling in the aisles. Why? Why? Why, you might ask. Kahneman explains this phenomenon as the ‘effects of cognitive load.’ When we are simultaneously challenged by a demanding cognitive task and a temptation, we are more likely to yield to the temptation. Stay focused or laugh at what might have been your friend, passing wind? Hmmmmmmm . . . . Sometimes, the temptation is a spontaneous event, like the one described above, but as I read Kahneman’s description of the effects of cognitive load, I also thought about the many times that the class clown seems to break out into class clownery when we doing a test or something that requires a similar level of effortful concentration. Perhaps, that’s exactly what we’re seeing here: system 1 trying to relieve that system 2 from having to focus and put forth a sustained effort.



EGO DEPLETION

Ask students to complete a really challenging task. Make it something they’re really going to have to focus on. Also, make it something they’re not particularly excited to do. Have them work steadily on it until completion. Great. It’s done. Now what’s next? Another challenging task? Not if you want students to complete it. Kahneman suggests that if you ask someone to complete a challenging task after he/she has just completed a task that requires self-control and effort - a serious system 2 task, he/she is likely to give up on the second challenge much more quickly than usual. Kahneman calls this ego-depletion. The implications for classroom scheduling are obvious. Alternating between high-intensity tasks and those that are less challenging makes sense, even if teachers are only providing short breaks from the focused thinking that is characteristic of system 2 thinking.


I could continue, and hopefully, as I continue to read, take notes, and reflect on the implications of Kahneman’s findings to our world of teaching and learning, I will be able to share more in the near future. I am truly fascinated by the thought processes Kahneman describes. Their relevance to our work as teachers is obvious, but it’s Kahneman’s style, his use of story and humour that make ‘Thinking Fast and Slow’ a very readable and enjoyable study.

6 comments:

  1. Thanks Mardie, for sharing some of this book. It does sound interesting & certainly applicable to classrooms. I wondered if there was any leaway to application for individual behavior? I have found that there are differences in the behavior that you describe definitely depending on the maturity of the student and their motivation to do well. Of course my experience is with gifted students, another factor. Thanks for summarizing the information.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I totally agree, Linda. These are not fixed behaviour patterns, but they are tendencies that are fairly natural, and knowing this helps me to understand myself and my students better. I'm sure that as I continue to read Kahneman will further explore the ways in which we learn to redirect ourselves from system 1 thinking to the more appropriate system 2 thinking, or to consciously recognize when these patterns are interfering with sound decision making and responses to events.

    ReplyDelete
  3. "Thinking Fast and Slow" has been on my TBR list. I'm particularly interested in the idea of Ego Depletion. I've been reading "Quiet" by Susan Cain, and I'm curious about Kahnmen's ideas will harmonize w/ Cain's, especially the notion of "quiet persistence" and its cultural implications and construct. Also, in my dual enrollment Communication class one difficult assignment follows immediately upon the previous one. There's literally no breathing room because of the curricular demands and our trimester being a week shorter for seniors. Looks as though I'll be ordering yet another book!

    ReplyDelete
  4. I'm reading 'Quiet' by Susan Cain as well, Glenda! I've just started it, but I'm enjoying it.

    I believe that the phenomena that Kahneman discusses - like many discoveries in the world of psychology - are very real. That doesn't mean that we can't move beyond our tendencies and our habits, however they are there.
    For example, I remember learning, many years ago in my psych classes, that we are naturally predisposed to question our own judgements of things if everyone else in the room disagrees with us. The experiments were simple. They put one real subject in a room with several others who were 'actors' in the psych trial. The investigators showed the group a series of lines of different lengths on one page of paper. They were asked to point out which line was the shortest. Everyone in the room 'agreed' that one line was the shortest, even though it was clearly not the shortest line. Although the 'subject' could easily see that this was an incorrect judgement, he/she would almost always agree with the rest of the group and would later tell investigators that he/she really questioned his/her own ability to see which line was the shortest.

    Certainly, we teach our students to have stamina, to overcome things like ego depletion, the pressure to agree with others despite our own judgements, to overcome the 'effects of cognitive load,' etc., etc. And yet, our natural tendencies are still there.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hey Mardie!

    I wrote a book for teachers (especially useful to those without pensions) called Millionaire Teacher, The Nine Rules of Wealth You Should Have Learned in School. If you'd like a free copy as a doorstopper (or for review on your blog!) please give me a shout and I'll mail you one! andrewhllmATyahoo.com
    Cheers,
    Andrew Hallam

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Andrew! Thanks for letting me know about your book. Luckily, I will have a pension when I retire, but your book still sounds interesting. I will check it out.

      Delete